Four Critical Components in Successful Project Implementations

As most project managers know, having solely a project plan does not guarantee project success. We can fill entire buildings with project plans that are associated with failed projects.

I have found in my experience that there are generally Four Critical Components that a project manager must consider when implementing programs or projects to assess the probability of success for his project.

1. Senior Management Support - this is a key ingredient to success. The project must have full senior management support and this does not mean just financially, but that helps of course, but senior management must believe in the output and must advocate for it to the general business community. This is where excellent stakeholder management skills come into play. A project manager must understand what BUSINESS KPIs are important to senior management, how the project supports those and what is the ONE PROJECT KPI that senior management will protect in times of crisis - cost, schedule, quality, scope?

2. A Solid Strategy - Thee project must tie up to an overall business strategy that can span multiple years and it must be an important part of that strategy. The strategy must be concrete (not just a vague vision), comprehensive, sustainable and drives significant incremental value to the company or client. If the project feels more like an off activity then it probably is a rogue project and we all know that at crunch time - nice to have projects are no match to critical to do projects.

3. An Enabled Talent Pool - we all know this - even the best project plans out there will not bring any benefit to the company and the project if the people leading and executing the plans are not properly enabled and/or not the caliber required by the project. Don't be deceived by some people saying that project managers are generalists - the best project managers I have seen are actually specialists. Not to say that they can't run general projects but they excel in their chosen fields. The project team members must also complement one another, know their roles and must be properly resourced to execute their jobs. The most mature team are those that understand that individual superheroes do more damage than good to a team and at the end of the day - it is the entire project team - working as one - that can deliver successful projects.

4. A Consistent and Appropriate Set of Tools and Processes - from process definition, handovers and even documentation requirements - all of these must be consistent and appropriate for the project being undertaken. A good PM will know the different process and tools (like those from the PMBOK) - a great PM will know which processes and tools will be most effective in the project. Discuss early on in the project what processes will the team follow, who will do what at every task (RACI), what documents will be required at what phase and what tools will be used to create and share project assets across team members. Regularly assess as well how the tools and processes are helping the project and be open to changing them if need be.

Red Pill or Blue Pill? (Living in the Matrix)

Most of us, unfortunately, were not given the choice that Neo was given in the movie The Matrix and we typically either land in a matrix environment or not.

I lived in both worlds and I can attest to the fact that whichever organization structure you are in - they all have their pros and cons. I can say, though, that it is the matrix environment that required me, as a project manager, to develop some specific skills that allowed me to navigate it.

Why is it tricky to navigate? For one, aside from your immediate project team, most of the people you need to be successful do not directly report to you. That means that, chances are, their priorities are different from yours and they can derail your project with less of a concern in terms of performance reviews - as long as their real boss agrees with them. There is also this need to have more communication channels which open your team up to a lot of possible miscommunications.

So what skills did I need to succeed in this environment?

1. Influence - John Maxwell, in his book, Developing The Leader Within You actually said that "Leadership is Influence" and never is it more apparent than in a matrix environment. Unlike a direct report, you need to influence more a person or team that does not report to you to buy into your plan and work with you to succeed

2. Communication - Communication takes on a deeper meaning in a matrix environment since it is the glue that keeps everyone pasted onto your objective as you try to move everyone to the goal and as I mentioned, I realized that in a matrix environment,  there is a need to have more communication channels laterally since one characteristic of a matrix environment is that the org chart is a lot flatter but broader.

3. "Ball Handling" - The matrix was created for several good reasons and one of them is to allow expertise to develop in a group while allowing these experts to work in your projects - sounds good but this requires that, as a project manager, you should know when to pass the ball and to whom. This message got imprinted on me in a workshop when excepts of the movie Goal! - The Dream Begins was shown to us.

4. The ability to see the bigger picture - There were times that I needed to admit that truly my project was less of a priority than a project my matrix team was working on and I had to give way and replan my project because at the end of the day - the question is "which project stands to give the company the best possible benefit vs cost". Some days - that project is not yours.

So why does the matrix still exist amidst the complexities it has? It is only the matrix environment that allows a company to have the expertise and flexibility to execute projects through different resources. For it to be as productive as possible though - the matrix must move as one as a project manager - you are one of those people that steer it.